Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
V. Gopala Krishna Rao, J
GANISETTI SITARAMAYYA – Appellant
Versus
AMBATI LAKSHMI KUMARI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court assesses the basis for partition claims regarding ancestral property. (Para 1 , 3 , 6 , 12) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties regarding property status. (Para 4 , 10 , 16) |
| 3. court emphasizes the rights established by hindu succession (amendment) act. (Para 18 , 19 , 22 , 24) |
| 4. final judgment confirms lower court findings regarding the plaintiff's entitlement. (Para 26 , 27) |
Judgment:
This second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure (“C.P.C.” for short) is filed aggrieved against the Judgment and decree, dated 17.03.2023 in A.S.No.27 of 2018, on the file of the III Additional District Judge, Bhimavaram (“First Appellate Court” for short), confirming the Judgment and decree, dated 20.04.2018 in O.S.No.4 of 2012, on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Bhimavaram (“Trial Court” for short).
2. The appellants herein are the defendants and the respondent herein is the plaintiff in O.S.No.4 of 2012, on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Bhimavaram.
3. The plaintiff initiated action in O.S.No.4 of 2012 with a prayer for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares by metes and bounds and to allot one such share to the plaintiff and fo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
