Mr. Vallabhneni Vamsi Mohan vs The State Of A P - 2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 5717

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: V. Devi Satya Sri
For the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Table of Content
1. petition filed for anticipatory bail. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner's case based on lack of evidence and delays. (Para 3)
3. contestation of mla's authority and allegations. (Para 5 , 6)
4. dispute over fir procedure as per bnss. (Para 7 , 9)
5. application of special laws over ipc. (Para 12 , 15)
6. concerns of political vendetta and delay in complaint. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
7. critique of section 386 ipc applicability. (Para 22 , 23)
8. analysis of extortion elements and burden of proof. (Para 24 , 25 , 26)
9. call for thorough investigation and legal compliance. (Para 28 , 29 , 30)
10. order for compliance with procedural safeguards. (Para 32 , 33)

The court made the following ORDER:

1. The petitioner/A.1 has filed this Criminal Petition by invoking the provisions of Sections 4 82 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [for short, “ BNSS ’), seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with Crime No.75 of 2025 of Gannavaram Police Station, Krishna District, involving the offences punishable under Section 3 84 , 420, 406, 379, 120(B) r/w. 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (referred to as the 'I.P.C.') and Section 4 r/w. 21(1) of the Mines and Minerals (Development a