HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
V.Sadasiva – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District and 2 others – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ filed by home guards challenging termination. (Para 1) |
COMMON ORDER
All these writ petitions are filed by the terminated/removed Home Guards under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of Writ of Mandamus to declare the proceedings issued by the respondents either terminating or removing them from Home Guards Organisation as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and principles of natural justice; consequently set aside those proceedings and direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioners into Home Guards Organisation along with other consequential benefits.
W.P.No.16218 of 2019
The petitioner herein challenged the proceedings D.O.No.07 of 2012, Rc.No.B7/HGs/1295/2012 dated 19.06.2012 issued by respondent No.3.
The petitioner was deputed to work at Kuppam RTC Bus Depot. While discharging his duties, the petitioner allegedly misbehaved with ladies during Jatharas in intoxicated condition and collected money from the villagers styling himself as police constable, thereupon a letter was addressed by A.P.Road Transport Corporation for surrendering the petitioner to the Home Guards Organisation. Later, a s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.