\\

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAV THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE =PRESENT:

HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1648 OF 20qO Between :

Bavisetti Chakrapahani, s/a Gangaraju, 39 years, CultivatI|on, R/a Someswaram, Rayavaram ManclaI! East Godavari District.

...Petitiom©r/AppellamtIAccurs©cI AND

1. Karri NagamanI', W/a Late Satyanarayana, 42 years, Housewife, Vakada, Karapa Mandai.

2. The State ofAndhra Pradesh, rep. by its public prosecutor, High Courfe of Andhra Prac!esh at+ Amaravati.

a MRespondents/Resp®mc§emarG®mp§aimam£

Revl|sion filed under sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.a., agal'mst the Judgment of the m Additl-onai District & Sessions Juclge, Kakinacia, c!t.13-0§- 2010 in Crl.A|No.257 of 2008, confirming the Judgment and conviction and sentences passed by the IV Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kakinada, in c.c.No.109 of 2006, ci.I 14-08-2008. EAn!@iJgQEL2gjPJgE!E£ngEE§!gi2ggiEE±

petition under sectjom 397(1) ©f Cr.P.C pray!'mg that im the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in shippoit ®F the petI'tiOn, the High Court may be pleased t® susFBend the e%eethti®rm ®f sentemees passed by the iv' Additional Judicial MagistraE© ®f First eiass, Kakinada, in c.c.No.109 of 20067 dt.14-08-2CO8 as €®nfirmed by the !!j Additional District a sessioms Judge, Kakimada, in ©rl.A.N©.257 ®f 2®®©, d.t

13-09-2010 and release th.e petitioner on bail, Pending disposal of`cRLRC

1648 of 2010, on the file of thJ6 High court.

The PetI'tiOn coming On fOr``he~aring, upon perusing the PetI-lion and the inemorandum of grounds file-d':'ih'4'supporf thereof and the earlier order of the High Court dated 15.09.201tb' inade in crl,R.C.M.P.No.2407 of 2010, made 'herel-n and upon hearing the``afguments of Mr. Ismail, learned counsel )

representing smt D. Sangeetha Reddy Advocate for the petitioner, and having observed that there is nQ rePreSentatI-On for Respondent No.1, the Court made the following .' I-'.-'-

ORDER:

Mr.IsmaiI, learned eoL!nSel representI-mg Smt.D.Sangeetha Ready, learned counsel for the betiti6ner submI-tS that they had I-SSued notice t6 petitioner/accused on 29.03.£`$25 requiring the petitllOner tO give CEu6 instructions for arguing the^QFiininaI Revision case| Learned counsel foFT the petitl-oner also submI-t'S` that-- he has not received any informatiori from the Petitioner and req¥ested to secure the presence of the petitioner| I -

None appeared for the respondent No.1.

This Criminal RevI-SiOn Case has been filed challenging the concurrent convllCtiOn for the offence punishable under section 138 of N.I. Act which I-S COmPOunCiab`ga render SectI-On 147 of NII.Act.

Therefore, issue ballab!e Warrant to the petit]-oner ffhr®digha ftfue~

Superintendent of police coric6rmed.

on arrest of the peti±i-ainer- he sha" be released on bail ®m tfroeiF`

executing a personal bond for Rs.10,000/-(RurE3eeS Hem Thiousand ®mBy) along wI-th two sureties fort-a, like sum eacth t® thee satB-SfaCti®m Off Shae leaFmed IV AdeIIlti®maI JLldieflaa§ REagisftFafl® Off Firsfl GIass9 EL{akimadia9 Wffi® passed Judgment im c.c|N®p1®9 ®f 2006| Tthe E®amed lv AddiiflE-®maI JudicllaI REagistrate ®f First C8ass9 Kakimada, shiaEE obtaim urmdieFflalkimg I ,,-- . `ir/I Ith affidavit from the petjtjoner duly stall-ng that he would gIIve jnstructllons to their counsel for dispo~/sing of the case on merits. The learned lv AddIItl-anal JudicI-aI Magistrate of FI-rSt CIass, Kakinada, I-S also dI-reCted to gI-Ve necessary instructioms to the accused to appear before this court and also on giving due ,-nstructions to his counsel|

- Sd/-E.KAMESWAR RAO I ITFTHE COPY I I SECTION OFFICER {

To, 1. The Registrar (JudiciaI}, High court of Andhara pradesth aft Amaravati

2. The IV AddI'tiOnal Juclicja! Magl'strate of Fjrs{ class, Kakinada, East Godavarj Dl'strict

3. The Ill Additional District & sessions Judge, KakI|nada, East Godavari District •± I

4. The superintendent of pctI'6e',-Kakinada District

5. The supe