HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
SRI T MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J
Vallabhaneni Vamsi Mohan – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3591/2025|APHC010168272025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks bail under specific criminal charges. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's argument hinges on faulty investigation and political bias. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court hears both parties and their arguments. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. factors affecting the grant of bail. (Para 7 , 15 , 18) |
| 5. ongoing investigation requires caution before granting bail. (Para 8 , 19 , 36 , 37) |
| 6. legal proceedings must follow due process, highlighting investigational flaws. (Para 20 , 22 , 26) |
| 7. bail application dismissed on grounds of potential witness tampering. (Para 38 , 39) |
ORDER:
1) Under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, ' BNSS '), this Criminal Petition has been filed by the petitioner herein/A.71 seeking regular bail, in Cr.No.137 of 2023 of Gannavaram Police Station, Krishna District, registered for the offences punishable under sections 143, 147, 148, 435, 506 r/w. 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (referred to as the 'I.P.C.') and Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (POA) Act, 1989 (referred to as ‘the Act’).
2) The prosecution's case, as outlined in the report dated 22.02.2023, is as follows:
(i) One Mudunuri Satya Vardhan, the de facto complainant, works as a computer operator in the Gannavaram Telugu Desam Party office and belongs to the SC Madiga community. On 20.02.2023 in the evening, Pitta Mahesh, driver of Kalyani, was in the office at about 5.00 P.M. The local MLA-Vallabhaneni Vamsi Mohan came in two black Scorpio cars (AP 39 LR 0333, AP 39 LB 0333) and stopped in the front of party office and threatened that today itself the Telugu Desam Party is over and went away by observing the surroundings.
(ii) At about 5.30 P.M., the followers of the YCP party belonging to Gannavaram Constituency, including the petitioners herein and other accused, attacked altogether and entered the office and shouted “jai Vallabhaneni Vamsi" and threw stones and illegally entered the party office with deadly weapons and trying to break the furniture, two computers and two televisions and then one Volupalli Mohan Ranga Rao, Yatendra Ramakrishna, Gondi Paramdamaiah, Mulupuri Prabhukanth and Pothumarthi Hemanth of YCP party said to him and Mahesh with touching the caste of the defacto complainant and told that all the furniture in the party office was smashed with sticks, cricket wickets and stones. Another is damage to the three cars which are parked in the compound. Rabbani poured petrol on a car bearing No.AP 16 DA 5555, the said car was burnt, and the entire episode took place before the Police. All the YCP rowdy leaders illegally formed a group; they attacked their Telugu Desam Party office, destroyed the furniture and set cars on fire, threatening to kill all the people, saying that they would kill anyone who came across their Vamsi. The accused attacked their Telugu Desam Party office with the instigation of the local Legislator Vallabhaneni Vamsi as an illegal group. They insulted the defacto complainant in the name of his caste.
3) It is contended in the petition that the petitioner has been falsely implicated as A.71 in Crime No.137 of 2023, despite the absence of any reference to his name in the complainant’s report or any specific acts attributed to him. The offences, based on political rivalry, are baseless. Sections 436, 450 IPC , and the SCs & STs (POA) Act are inapplicable. The investigation under F.I.R.No.136 of 2023 has been completed, with a charge sheet filed. Cr.No.137 of 2023 is merely an additional charge based on the same facts. He has cooperated fully with the investigation. Despite his earlier bail application (Crl.M.P.No.156/2025) being dismissed, several co-accused have been granted bail by this Court (A5 vide Crl.P.No.5202/2024 and 14 others vide Crl.P.No.5375/2024) and 30 others by the Special Court.
4) The learned Public Prosecutor filed a counter, contending that the present bail petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C., is not maintainable, as provision
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.