Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, Dr K Manmadha Rao, JJ
P. Rathnaiah – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of land acquisition process. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. grounds raised by the appellant against acquisition. (Para 5 , 8 , 11) |
| 3. rejection of previous applications by the court. (Para 6 , 7 , 12) |
| 4. importance of jurisdiction and notifications in acquisitions. (Para 10 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. application of appropriate government provisions. (Para 20 , 22 , 24) |
| 6. interpretation of ‘appropriate government’ criteria. (Para 26 , 29 , 30) |
| 7. interlocutory order and conclusion on appeal. (Para 34 , 35 , 36) |
The Court made the following: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)
Heard Sri D. Krishna Murthy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri V. Vinod K. Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant and the learned Advocate General appearing for the Respondents.
2. The appellant herein is the owner of various extents of land, in different survey members of Peddetipakam Village, Satyavedu Mandal, Tirupathi District, aggregating to Ac.4.49 cents, having inherited the same from his father. The appellant contends that this land is double crop wet lands irrigated by a Minor Irrigation Tank and bore wells.
3. On 21.03.2006 about 12,000 acres in 15 revenue villages of Chittoor District
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
