SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 15491

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
N. Ramachandra Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
CRLP 7324 / 2024



h IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ti PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA l-A No.1 of 2025 in CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7324 OF 2024 Between:

N.Ramachandra Reddy, S/o.Venkata Reddy, Aged about 45 years, R/o.Pothulakunta village, Kothacheruvu Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District.

...Petitioner/Accused AND State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi.

...Respondent Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to directed to post the Criminal petition No.7324/2024 under the caption “For Being Mentioned” in the tomorrow’s cause list.

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri C Subodh, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent/State and the order of the High Court dated

03.12.2024 in CrI.P No. 7324 of 2024.

The Court made the following:

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner/accused and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State.

As can be seen from the order passed by this Court dated 03.12.2024 in Crl.P.NQ,7324 of 2024, there is a mistake crept in the order to the effect that .•s the offend punishable under Section 65 of BNS, so the application under Section>482 of BNSS does not arise. Needless to say that for the act of the Court,’"tpe* party cannot suffer. On that ground, the order of disposal of CrI.P.No. 7fe4 of 2024 is recalled.

At the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner/accused, the matter be listed in the 1st Vacation Court i.e., on 15.05.2025 for hearing afresh.

Registry is directed to annex the copy of this Order to the final order passed in Crl.P.No.7324 of 2024 and upload the same afresh.

Sd/- SHAIK MOHD. RAFI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER To.

1. The Station House Officer, Kothacheruvu Urban Police Station, Sri Satya Sai District.

2. One CC to Sri C Subodh Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati [OUT]

4. Three CD Copies VNA *along with the final order passed in CrI.P No. 7324 of 2024 dated

03.12.2024 HIGH COURT DATED;09/05/2025 Note; After the disposal ofthis order, file may be sent to Criminal Section for fiirther posting on 15/05/2025 ORDER I.A No.1 of 2025 in CRLP.No.7324 of 2024 RECALLING THE DISPOSAL ORDER THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION No.7324 of 2024 ORDER:

The Criminal Petition filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on behalf of the petitioner/accused herein to grant anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.128/2024 of Kothacheruvu U Police Station, Sri Sathya Sai District.

2. A case has been registered against the petitioner for the offence punishable under Sections 64 read with 62, 118(2), 351(3) BNS.

3. Heard both sides and perused the record.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that it is a case and counter. The petitioner approached the police to give a complaint on the very same day and that was refused. Petitioner sustained injuries and he was hospitalized. On 05.10.2024 the complaint of the petitioner was sent through post which was refused by the police. That itself shows the conduct of the police to receive the complaint from the petitioner. Learned counsel would further submit that there is a long pending dispute relating to the parties which is civil in nature. Father of the petitioner lodged a case against father in law of the victim on 15.7.2013. In the light of the history of the civil litigation pending between the parties indicates it is a false case alleged against the petitioner after harassing him brutally and prays to allow the petition.

5. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that Investigation is at crucial stag

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top