SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 6757

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Yarramsetty Sravani alias Ande Sravani – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WP 11993 / 2025



IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 11993 OF 2025 Between:

Yarramsetty Sravani alias Ande Sravani, W/o Yarramsetty Anjaneyulu, Aged about 33 Years, Occupation Homemaker, Resident of Sannamuru Village Marripudi Mandal, Prakasam District.

...Petitioner AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by it's Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

2. The Superintendent of police, Prakasam District, Ongole.

3. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Kanigiri, Prakasam District.

4. The Inspector of Police, Kondapi, Prakasam District.

5. The Station House Officer(SHO), Marripudi Police Station, Marripudi, Prakasam District.

6. Mancha Venkateswarlu, S/o Ramaiah, Aged About 52 Years, Occupation Cultivation, Resident of Sannamuru Village, Marripudi Mandal, Prakasam District.

7. Mancha Venkateswarlu, S/o Kondaiah, Aged About 55 Years, Occupation Government Employee, Resident of Siddavari Street, Chimakurthy Village, Chimakurthy Mandal, Prakasam District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of

Respondents,

m Specifically respondent is not providing police aid to the petitioner and her family members from restrain 6*'" and 7^'' Respondents and their men.

agents, assignees and representatives to enter and construct the house at ' an extent of Ac. 0.01 Cents in survey No.29 of Sannamuru Village, Marripudi Mandal, Prakasam District, through considering the report of the petitioner dated 15.04.2025 as illegal, arbitrary, discrimination and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents, Specifically 5**^ respondent to provide police aid to the petitioner and her family members to the restrain 6*^

and Respondents and their men, agents, assignees and representatives to enter and construct the house at an extent of Ac. 0.01 Cents in survey No.29 of Sannamuru Village, Marripudi Mandal, Prakasam District.

lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents, Specifically 5*^

Respondents to provide police aid to the petitioner and her family members to restrain 6th and 7 Respondents and their men, agents, assignees and representatives to enter and construct the house at an extent of Ac. 0.01 Cents in survey No.29 of Sannamuru Village, Marripudi Mandal, Prakasam District, pending disposal of the above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI GUNDALA SIVA PRASADA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order:

APHC010241162025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3457]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 11993/2025 Between:

Yarramsetty Sravani Alias Ande Sravani, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1.GUNDALA SIVA PRASADA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 11993 OF 2025 ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Home.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction of respondent No.5 in not considering the petitioner’s representation dated 15.04.2025

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Home submits that the petitioners’ representation dated 15.04.2025 will be co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top