Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
V. Sujatha, J
Oruebtak Insurance Co Ltd – Appellant
Versus
P Anusha and Others – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal against awarded compensation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. death due to motor vehicle accident. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. insurance company's denial of liability. (Para 7 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. rash and negligent driving confirmed. (Para 10 , 12) |
| 5. assessment of compensation based on income. (Para 13 , 23) |
| 6. multiplier and income considered for damage calculation. (Para 20 , 24) |
| 7. court upholds compensation awarded by tribunal. (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
JUDGMENT
Aggrieved by the impugned award and order passed in M.V.O.P.No.31 of 2016 on the file of the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-VII Additional District Judge, Prakasam District, Ongole whereby the Tribunal awarded an amount of Rs.10,90,000/- towards total compensation to the claimants, this instant appeal is preferred by the Insurance company (respondent No.3 before the Tribunal).
2) For the sake of convenience, both the parties in the appeal will be referred to as they are arrayed in the claim application.
3) The claimants filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act claiming compensation of Rs.12,00,000/- towards compensation for the death of the Naresh Babu @ Naresh, (herein after referred to as “dece
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
