Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Ravi Nath Tilhari, J
Saikiran Karna – Appellant
Versus
Alla Gurava Reddy – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case and properties involved. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. court's view on alternative remedies available and urgency of proceedings. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. final ruling on the petition. (Para 10) |
ORDER :
Heard Sri N.Ravi Prasad, learned counsel for the proposed petitioner, and perused the material on record.
2. The 1st respondent is the decree-holder/plaintiff. The 2nd respondent is the judgment-debtor/defendant. The petitioner is the third party.
3. O.S. No.196 of 2012 on the file of the XIV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, was filed for recovery of money with subsequent interest and costs by the 1st respondent/plaintiff and was decreed against the 2nd respondent/defendant, vide judgment and decree dated
11.03.2015.
4. The 1st respondent/plaintiff filed E.P.No.17 of 2021, in which the Execution Court passed an order dated 24.04.2024, rejecting the objection raised by the judgment-debtor against the notice issued under Order 21 Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure ,1908, (in short ‘CPC’) and directing attachment of the E.P. schedule property. An attachment notice under Rule 54(1-A)
was issued to the judgment-debtor through Cour
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
