HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
NYAPATHY VIJAY, J
Talari Mohan Rao – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER: .I.~i., I E£The present Writ Petition-is filed, questioning the Notice dated
18.06.2025 issued by ResPO'ndent No.4 vide Roe.No.156/2024/G1, dated 18.06.2025 pursuant tot;.the-order passed in W.P.(PIL)lNo.25 of
2020. .-` ,`.
The issue in question in this.Writ Petition is that construction' of a temple in a park area located,.-i-n Sy.Mos. 29, 31 and 32 of Bethavo[u Village, Gudivada MandaI,I under Ward-C, BIock No.7J Gudivada Municipality, Krishna District. :
The HonJble Division _B-.en'ch of this Court:, while disposing of the W.PI(P.lL)INol25 of 2020.h.e.!`d.at Paragraph 8, 9 and 10 as under:
{f8. We are also amzed ati'..the stand reflected in the reply affidavit filed both by the District Collector,o+__P€rishna District as also the CommjssIIoner of Gudivada Municipality at the:manner in which they. have not only I _>-:I, ,.
permitted the encroachment of a public place which was being used as a `~ .~ `...=' I ,.
Park but also their sheer helplessness in enforcing the provisions of law for purposes of removal of such am encroachment notwithstandillg the fact that what was constructed upon such an encroachment over a park was a temple. Merely because a temple is constructed by the en
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.