Back
2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 8003
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J
Bobbala Sambasiva Rao, Bobbala Pratima – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5596 OF 2025
For the Appellants/Petitioners: VINODIN RUTH MADAPALLI
For the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The court affirmed the continuation of interim bail provisions for the petitioners pending further hearings.
Headnote:This case involves a petition for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioners, Bobbala Sambasiva Rao and Bobbala Pratima, in the context of Crime No.31 of 2025. The court assessed prior orders and granted an extension for interim relief for an additional two weeks. The main issue revolved around ensuring the petitioners' rights in the event of arrest. The court reinforced protection measures while scheduling a follow-up hearing on 08.07.2025.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background and context for bail considerations. (Para 2) |
| 2. final order extending interim bail. (Para 4) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMAR THURSDAy, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5596 OF 2025 Betwee n :
1. Bobbala Sambasiva Rao, S/o.Subba Rao, aged about 61 years, R/o.
Plot No.200, D.No.8-198, Sitapuram Colony PorankI' Village,, Penamaluru Mandal, Krishna District.
2. Bobbala Pratima, W/Q.Venugppala Naidu, aged about 39 years, r/o.Plot No.36, D.No.8-135,.:Sitapuram Colony Poranki Village, Penamaluru Mandal Krishna Dis`trict; `
Petitioners/Accused Mos.5&6 AND The State ofAndhra PradeSh, through S.H.O., L & O ., Gunadala P.S., Vijayawada city, rep. By its. Public Prosecutor, High Court at Amaravati.
Respondent/Complainant Petition under Sections 482 of BNSS (old 438 of Cr.P.C), is filed prayI'ng that in the circumstances stated tin the affl-davit filed in support of the Criml'nal Petition, the High Court-ma`y b6 pleased to direct the release of the petitI-OnerS/accused No. 5 and 6 on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest in crime No.31 OF 2025 6n the file of L & O., Gunadala P.S., Vijayawada City.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perus]-ng the petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and the earlier orders of the High Court dated:16.06.2025, 23.06.2025, 30.06.2025, & 01.07.2025, made herein and upon hearing the arguments of M/s. VINODIN RUTH MADAPALLl, Advocate: for the petitioners and of' PUBHC, PROSECUTOR for the Respondent, the Court made the following;
•.1 : S ORDER:
At request, list these matters on o8.07.2O25 along wllth crI.PINos|97 and 3544 of 2025.
\..~
Interim orders grante,q fearlier, shall stand extended for a further J'PeriOd Of tWO Weeks. , _..±.+.Ir.='`f.`
r sd/._ k.I+`ATA RAG DEPUTY REGI • ,J1 //TRUE COPY//
OFFICER I SE To, 1. The Vll Additional DistrI-6t&: Sessions Judge, Vijayawada. I
2. The Station House Officer, L & O., Gunadala P.S., VI-jayaWada CI'ty
3. OneCCto M/s.VINODIN`RUTH MADAPALLIAdvocate[opuc] a
4. Two CCs to Public,Prosecutor, High Court ofAP [OUT]
5. One spare copy PsR I i `[\l``
i,`
;~+`^`.'`+ `'; ,=* .
€.I \ \ -i .` --=-,_`.-i:-
HIGH COURT SRK,J DATED.IO3.07.2025I NOTE: ]]lst these matters on o8.07.2025 along with crl.p.Mos.97 and 3544 of 2025.
