SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 8111

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
T.C. Sekhar, J
M AREEDU SITHA RAMA SWAMY – Appellant
Versus
M ATTA SUBRAMANYESWARA RAO – Respondent
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 793/2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M P V N V SASTRI
For the Respondents:

A Civil Revision Petition becomes infructuous if the petitioned order is satisfied and executed.

Headnote:The petition filed under Article 227 challenges the Docket Order in an execution petition. The High Court ruled that since the execution petition was allowed and reported full satisfaction, the present Civil Revision Petition does not survive. As a result, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs awarded.

Table of Content
1. petition under article 227. (Para 1)
2. execution petition allowed; cause does not survive. (Para 2)
3. civil revision petition dismissed. (Para 3)

THURSDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 793/2024 Between:

1. M AREEDU SITHA RAMA SWAMY,, S/O LATE SANJIVA, AGE 58 YRS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O KAKARAVADA VILLAGE MUDINEPALLI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND

1. M ATTA SUBRAMANYESWARA RAO, S/o Nancharaiah, Age 34 yrs, Occ Cultivation, R/o Jinjeru Village Pedana Mandal, Krishna District.

...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased to allow the CRP by set aside the Docket Order dt 15.03.2024 passed in E.P.No.34/2018 IN, O.S.No.70/2015, on the file of SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE.

KAIKALURU and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including proposed auction dt: 15.04.2024 in Ep no 34/2018 in OS no in 70/2015 on the field senior civil judge court in kaikuluru during the pendency of the above CRP in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. M P V N V SASTRI Counsel for the Respondent:

1.

The Court made the following:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 793 of 2024

ORDER:

No representation for the petitioner.

2. As can be seen from the e-Courts of District Judiciary, the Execution Petition in E.P.No.34 of 2018 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Kaikaluru was allowed by order dated 01.05.2024 after reporting full satisfaction in view of the memo filed by the decree holder. Therefore, the cause in the present Civil Revision Petition does not survive.

3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top