The court upheld the dismissal of a criminal petition due to insufficient evidence for interference at the investigation stage.

TUESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6561/2025 Between:

Danaboina Balaji ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S)

Others Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:

1. GINJUPALLI SUBBA RAO Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):

1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following Order:

1. The petitioner is arraigned as Accused No.4 in Crime No.29 of 2025 on the file of Vatticherukuru Police Station, for the offences under Sections331(4), 305(a) of the BNS Act , 2023 and Section 8(c) read with Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act .

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that except for the confession statement of the other accused, the petitioner is implicated as a co-accused, and that there has been no seizure from the custody of the petitioner.

3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, perused the record.

4. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that the investigation is pending.

5. Considering the nature of the allegations, this Court is not inclined to interfere at this stage.

6. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.