Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J
G AVAMMA GARI HANUMAKKA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court analysis of statutory obligations regarding rejection. (Para 2 , 5) |
| 2. petitioner sought mutation applications on expressed grounds. (Para 3) |
| 3. arguments regarding the authority and procedure followed by the tahsildar. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 4. statutory compliance is essential for fair administrative decisions. (Para 8) |
| 5. order for further consideration aligned with legal protocols. (Para 9) |
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following reliefs:-
“to issue a Writ One in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ Direction or Order declaring the action of the 4th respondent in rejecting the petitioners Mee Seva application No.MUT231101028600 MUT231101028226,MUT231101026410,MUT23110102553 6, MUT231101024953, MUT231101024478 dated 01.11.2023 on 25.11.2023 for mutation of his name in revenue records by issuing Pattadar Pass Books ePass Book and title deeds in respect of land admeasuring an extent of Ac.0.04 cents in Sy.No.600-3, Ac.1.16 cents in Sy.No.182-1, Ac.0.48 cents in Sy.No.174-3, Ac.0.62 cents in Sy.No.180-3, Ac.0.57 cents in Sy.No.181-3 and Ac.0.15 cents in Sy.No.410-2 in total Ac.3.02
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
