HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
V. SRINIVASA, J
Bharathj Axa General Insurance company Ltd., Presently merged with lclcI Lombard GIG Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Pudota Mery Anusha, Pudota Sathwjk, Pudota Kamala, Pudota Innaiah, Sitam Srinivasa Rao, Shaik Chinna Masthan, Vemuri Yedukondalu, Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent
MAGMA No: 39 of 2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. interim order sought under cpc. (Para 1) |
| 2. court's jurisdiction to extend relief. (Para 3) |
...Appellant/petitI-Oner AND
1. Pudota Mery Anusha, w/o. Rajesh, christian, Aged about 30 years, 2. Pudota sathwjk, s/o. Rajesh, chrjstjan, Aged about 4 years, (Bet-ng minor Rep. by her guardI-an and next friend mother)
3. Pudota Kamala, W/o. lnnaiah, christian, aged 55 years, 4. Pudota lnnaI'ah, S/o. Rajayya, christI-an, aged 60 years, (all are resident of lane, vjdyanagar, Guntur Guntur D]-strict, Guntur J. C.J. C)
5. Sitam srinivasa Rao, S/o. Venkateswarlu, Owner of mI|nj Van (AP O7TD
1856), R/o. Chandrajupalem, Bellamkonda mandaI, Guntur dI-Strict, SattenapaIIi, J.C.J.C.
6. Shaik chinna Masthan, s/o. Nagur Saheb, Owner of mini van (AP O7TD
1856) R/o. D.No. 1-102, Main Road, Thubadu, Nadendia Mandal Guntur district, chiiakalurI-Pet Pet J.C.J.C.
7. Vemuri yedukondalu, s/o. Guraval-ah, MI-ni Van Driver,R/o. D.No 9-24, DachepaIIi Post, Guntur D['strict, Gurazala, J.CJ.C.
i -_. `ap
8. Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd., Rep. by its Manager, E-8, RIICO Industrial Area, Sitapura Jaipur, Rajasthan -302022.
...Respondents Petition under' Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the petition, the High Court may belpleased to extend the I'nterim Stay Order passed by this Hon'ble Court in-IA.No.2 of 2024 in MACMA.No.39 of 2024, dated 20.12.2024, until further orders in the interest of justice, pending disposal of MAGMA No. 39 of 2024, on the file of the High Court.
Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the earlier order of the High Court dt 020.12.2024 made herein and upon hear'lng the arguments of SRI A.SAI ROHIT, Advocate for the Petitioner, and of SRI B.PARAMESEWARA RAO, Advocate for the Respondents, and the Court made the following ORDER:
'fHeard learned counsel for the petitioner/appeIIant.
I Listthe matter on 14.07[2o25|
Interim order granted earlier 'by this courtJ-`dated 20.12.2024 in [|A.NoI2 of 2024 is extended till 14.07.2025." \
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.