Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
SMT KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA, J
Bollavaram Giddaiah – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. common relief sought by petitioners (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. details of petitioners' appointments and services (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. petitioners argue eligibility for regularization (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. court’s reasoning on absorption and equal pay (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. final order regarding applications for absorption (Para 15) |
COMMON ORDER:-
Heard Sri Subramanyam Daraboina, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for School Education and Sri Mahesh Kumar Kancharla, learned counsel for the 5^*^ respondent.
2. The issue involved in all these ten writ petitions is common, therefore, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of all the writ petitions through this common order.
3. The relief sought by the writ petitioners in the writ petition is for a direction to the to 5‘^ respondents to absorb the services of the petitioners against the aided vacancies in the respondent college.
4. The petitioners were appointed as lecturers in respondent college by the appointment committee of the said college, The said appointment was pursuant to the advertisement given in the newspapers. All the petitioners were appointed in backlog vacancies reserved for SC-ST can
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
