HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
HARINATH.N, J
Yerrabothula Udaya Bhaskar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations against the accused concerning false implications. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's directive for investigation procedures under law. (Para 3) |
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6287/2025 Between:
Yerrabothula Udaya Bhaskar Reddy ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S)
Others Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. SAI SARAN CHODISETTY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following Order:
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in Crime No. 84 of 2025 on the file of Kolimigundla Police Station, Nandyal District, for the alleged offence under Sections 318(4), 351(2) of BNS.
2. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that the matter is still at the investigation stage.
3. Considering the submissions of the both the learned counsel, the criminal petition is disposed off, directing the Station House Officer/Investigating Officer, for the purpose of investigation in Crime No. 84 of 2025 on the file of Kolimigundl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.