Back
2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 9634
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA, J
Bokkisam Harika @ Vishnumolakala Harika – Appellant
Versus
Bokkisam Gopi – Respondent
IANo.1 Of 2025 lN TRCMP NO: 116 OF 2025
For the Appellants/Petitioners: smt. Marella Radha
For the Respondents: SRI RAJA REDDY KONETI
Court can extend interim orders pending further hearings in civil matters.
Headnote:This judgment concerns a petition filed under section 151 CPC for a stay of proceedings in H.M.O.P. No. 107 of 2024. The petitioner sought relief, and the court determined to extend the interim order until the next hearing date. The court emphasized the need for a counter affidavit to be filed by the respondent's counsel.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner requests for stay proceedings. (Para 1) |
| 2. court observes need for a counter affidavit. (Para 3) |
...Respondent petition under section 151 CPC., is filed Praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be Pleased tO Stay a" further Proceedings 'ln H.M.O.P. No. 107 of 2024 on the file Of the Principal Senior Civil Judge at Bapatla, Guntur District The petition coming On for hearing, upon PeruS-lng the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the order of the High Court dated o8.04.2025 & 09.05.2025 made herein and upon hearing the arguments Of smt. Marella Radha, Advocate for the Petitioner and Of SRI RAJA REDDY KONETl, Advocate for the Respondent, the Court made the following;
ORDER:
At request of learned counsel for the respondent, for fI-l[|ng coLJnter affI-davit, post the matter on o2.07.2025.
Interim order granted earlier by thI-S Court is extended till the next date of hearI-ng.
`#
sD/- K.SF2IN!VAS,'3, RAu"J I ASSiSTANT~REIST-R-kE //TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER.
To, 1. The Principal cjv" Judge (senI'Or D,'visjon), Bapatla, Guntur Distrl-ct.
2. One cc to smt. MARELLA RADHA, Advocate [opuc]
3. One cc to SRI RAJA REDDY KONETI, Advocate [opuc]
