Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
N. Vijay, J
Agnihotram Srinivas – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the need for tdr issuance is established by ownership and governmental rules. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the regulatory authority acknowledges pending tdr requests. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. the court mandates scrutiny by the committee within a specified timeframe. (Para 6) |
| 4. writ petition outcome with directions emphasizes legal process adherence. (Para 7) |
ORDER
The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the Respondents in failing to issue Transferrable Development Rights (TDR) for utilizing the land to an extent of 149.55 Sq.yds in (Old Sy.No. 42/2) New Sy.No. 42/2D of Gunadala Village, Vijayawada Municipal Corporation Area, Vijayawada belongs to the Petitioner for road widening and construction of drainage as illegal and arbitrary and contrary to the A.P. Building Rules, 2019.
2. The Petitioner claims to be the owner and possessor of the subject property, who acquired the same under a Registered Sale Deed No.2724 of 2011, dated 16.06.2011. While so, the above mentioned part of the property was utilized by the Respondent/ Corporation for the purpose of road widening and laying of drainage channel. As the Respondent No.2 neither issued TDR to the Petitioner nor prov
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
