Court requires legal procedures to be followed for addressing claims regarding rights to access land, affirming Articles 14 and 21 regarding fairness.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction of the respondents in considering the representation of the petitioners dated 16.09.2024.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that I.A.No.349 of 2022 in O.S.No.147 of 2022 filed by the respondent No.10 against the petitioners was also dismissed and the learned Judge had observed that the petitioners did not have right to obstruct the defendant and that the petitioner has no prima facie case and balance of convenience. The right of road or pathway or easements rights would exist for the petitioner and the respondent therein.

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, submits that the police have called the petitioner and the unofficial respondents and on enquiry it was found that there is a civil dispute pending between them and as such the parties were advised to redress their grievance before the competent Court.

4. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that the right of path way is there for the petitioner and I.A. filed by the respondent No. 10 herein was dismissed, the respondent shall consider the fresh representation submitted by the petitioner duly intimating the 5th respondent about the civil dispute and the order passed by the Court. On such receipt of representation, the same shall be considered in accordance with law as per the procedure contemplated under Section

173(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 , (for short, " BNSS ).

5. With the above observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.