Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
B S Bhanumathi, J
Kamavaram Aruna – Appellant
Versus
Manukindi Eranna – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. execution petition dismissed for lack of evidence. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. claimants were not allowed to present their evidence. (Para 4) |
| 3. court emphasized the need for fair opportunity in judicial processes. (Para 5) |
This Civil Revision Petition is filed under section 115 of C.P.C against the order dated 25.04.2025 dismissing E.P.No.145 of 2023 in O.S.No.22 of 2021 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, (Junior Division) at Adoni filed under Order 21 rule 32(1) CPC to order arrest of judgment debtors No.1 to 5 for disobedience of the decree for permanent injunction and send them to civil prison.
2. The revision petitioners/decree holders contended that judgment debtors No.1 to 5 are intentionally interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of D.Hrs over land to an extent of Ac.1.83 cents in survey No.147 of Kosigi village, Kurnool district and trying to damage the standing crop in BSB, J C.R.P.No.1369 of2025 that property. On receipt of notices, judgment debtors failed to appear before the execution Court. Hence, they were set exparte.
3. The D.Hrs filed E.A.No.277 of 2024 seeking police aid. The petition was not pressed on 21.04.2025. On the same da
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
