The court reaffirmed that dispossession threats during the pendency of injunction orders without proper enquiry are illegal and arbitrary.

a I.N THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARA (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 11554 OF 2025 Between :

K.Madhavi Latha, W/o.K.Subrahmanyam Naidu, aged about 67 years, residing at Door No.ll/105, Tarakarama Nagar, Opposite Agricultural Staff Quarters, Tirupati -517 505 ...Petitioner AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Secretary, Department of Revenue, Havl-ng Office at A.P. Secretariat Bul-ldings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District -522 238

2. The District Collector, Tirupati Dl-strict, Office at District Collectorate, Sri Padmavathi Nilayam, Tiruchanoor, Tirupati -517 503

3. The Revenue DivisionaI Officer, Tirupati Revenue Division, Tirupati.

4. The Tahsildar, Tirupati Rural MandaI Tirupati.

...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ, more particularly one in the nature of wrl-t of Mandamus, declaring the notice of the 4th respondent vide Roc.No.A/39/2025 dated 17.03.2025 invoking sectI-On 7 of the A.P. Land Encroachment Act, 1905 , in respect of land to an extent of Ac 0.30 cents in Sy.No.529/4A of Peruru Village, during the subsistence of an order of Permanent injunction granted by the IV Additional District Judge, Tirupati in A.`S.No.97 of 2000, in favour of the petitioner and more particularly during the t=-r*

pendency of the alienation proposals and their action in threatening to.. ;

dispossess me without conducting an enquiry under Section.6 of the A.P.

Land Encroachment Act, 1905 as illegal, without jurisdiction, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently set aside the notice of the 4th respondent vide Roe.No.AI39/2025 dated 17.03.2025.

IANO: 1 OF2025 Petition under Section 151 of CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the notice of the 4th respondent-vide Roc.No.A/39/2025 dated 17.03.2025, Pending disposal of WP 11554 of 2025, on the file of the High Court.

lANO: 2OF2025 Petition under Section 151 of CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in furtherance to the notice of the 4th respondent vide Roc.No.A/39/2025 dated 17.03.2025, pending disposal of vip 11554 of 2025, on the file of the High Court.

The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the orders of the High Court dated:05,05.2025 upon hearing the arguments of SRI MEKA RAHUL CHOWDARY Advocate for the Petitioner; and of GP FOR REVENUE, for the Respondents, the Court made the following ORDER:

± -±

fflnterim order granter earlier I-S extended till othe next date of I i .

hearing.

For fjfjng counter|affl[davjt by the learned AssI-Slant Government pfeader for Revenue, list the matter after sf-x (o6) weeks.J'

SD/-4,. V!,JAYAl`BABU ASSISTANT iS`±-*RAR r':, '|

//TRUE COPY//

+ '.-._ ..`J lON OFFICER For/ -`

To, 1. One CC to SRI. MEKA RAHUL CHOWDARYAdvocate [opuc]

2. Two cos to GP FOR REVENUE , High Court ofAndhra pradesh.

[OUT|

3. One spare copy HIGH COURT NV,J DATED :24/06/2025 NOTE: LIST THE MATTER AFTER SIX (06) WEEKS ORDER WP.No.11554 of 2025 INTERIM ORDER EXTENDED vul~#ife§#+i:*