SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 10542

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
KSuresh Reddy, J
Gaddam Siva Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Kondeti Geetha Madhuri – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri C Subodh
For the Respondents:

WHEREAS the Petitioner above 'named through his Advocate SRI C SUBODH presented thI-S Petition und6r Article 227 of the Constitution of India being Aggrieved by the order of the principal civil Judge (Senior Division),{ MadanapaIIe, Chittoor District tpassed in I.A.No.193 OF 2024 in H.M.O.P.NO.106 OF 2024 dated 07.04.2O25.

AND WHEREAS the High d6`uit upon perusing the petitI'On and memorandum of grounds filed her6ih: ah''d`-`rupon hearing the arguments of sri c SUBODH Advocate for the petitich6r, directed issue of notice to the Respondents herein to show cause as {o{ why this clvIL REVISION PETITION should not be admI-tted.

-_- ._i '-J You viz: i-_ i |

; Kondeti Geetha Madhuri, W/o. Gaddam sl'va prasad, Aged about 36 years`, R/o. Flat No.502, Ashok Avenue -A'bartment, Ashok Nagar, Kurnool.

.I( i.

are be and hereby directed to shd.vi`:6'ause either appearing in person or through an advocate on or before 25``07.2025 to which date the,case stands posted as to why in the circumstan`6es set out in the petition and the memorandum of grounds filed ther?`withr'`{copy enclosed) this CIVIL REVISION /

> '. -. .\.I .+ I_.-\±

PETITION should not be admitted.

lANO: 1 OF2025 ` .\

3 ` . ? .` ~ ; . .,\?

5

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top