HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
KSuresh Reddy, J
Gaddam Siva Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Kondeti Geetha Madhuri – Respondent
WHEREAS the Petitioner above 'named through his Advocate SRI C SUBODH presented thI-S Petition und6r Article 227 of the Constitution of India being Aggrieved by the order of the principal civil Judge (Senior Division),{ MadanapaIIe, Chittoor District tpassed in I.A.No.193 OF 2024 in H.M.O.P.NO.106 OF 2024 dated 07.04.2O25.
AND WHEREAS the High d6`uit upon perusing the petitI'On and memorandum of grounds filed her6ih: ah''d`-`rupon hearing the arguments of sri c SUBODH Advocate for the petitich6r, directed issue of notice to the Respondents herein to show cause as {o{ why this clvIL REVISION PETITION should not be admI-tted.
-_- ._i '-J You viz: i-_ i |
; Kondeti Geetha Madhuri, W/o. Gaddam sl'va prasad, Aged about 36 years`, R/o. Flat No.502, Ashok Avenue -A'bartment, Ashok Nagar, Kurnool.
.I( i.
are be and hereby directed to shd.vi`:6'ause either appearing in person or through an advocate on or before 25``07.2025 to which date the,case stands posted as to why in the circumstan`6es set out in the petition and the memorandum of grounds filed ther?`withr'`{copy enclosed) this CIVIL REVISION /
> '. -. .\.I .+ I_.-\±
PETITION should not be admitted.
lANO: 1 OF2025 ` .\
3 ` . ? .` ~ ; . .,\?
5
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.