The court emphasized the procedural necessity for all parties to be notified before considering the admission of a civil revision petition.

THE HONOURABLE SRI Ji;BS§TICE NINALA JAYASURYA clvlL REVISION PETITE.®N NO: 1310 OF 2025 .

Betwee n :

Mungala Ravindranadh Sai, S/o. S+!Pramanyam Aged about 62 years, R/o, 12-25-89, Kothapet, Main Road, Quntur I,,, i:`l}.A ... petitioner/petitioner/plaintiff • ;{ 3chirfeB , 1. The District Collector, CoIIectz3i-a#t613J:+-Guntur.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officier, F{,DO, Office,14th crossroad, Guntur.

3. The Tahsildar, Krosuru Mandalt,+,-rfei9Suru, Sattenapalli.

4. Chadalavada Koti Chadalavfa`:i*£-aJ[J srinivasa rao @ Srinivas, S/o.

.`_`

Radha-lan, 32 years, R/o. VibScl£l!i`a,village Atchempeta Mandal, Guntur District.

5. Chadalavada Radhaiah, S/or:Kotaiah, Aged about 82 years R/o.

vipparla village, Atchempeta Mandal, Guntur District a. I`Re{spondent/Respondent/Defendants WHE,REAS the Petitioner a named through his Advocate SRi KANADHI BHATLA SRINIVASA~ gr.fi-!*iiaTHY presented this Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution t-`-{5f;:!hdia is filed, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grourl,js`'`;`r`filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order daS:e&'J27-12-2024 in lA.No.1414/2024 in os.No. 322/2016 on the file of thfa' F+fincipaI C'lvil Judge (Junior Division)

sattenapalli and allow lA.No.1414/202,4 im OS.No. 322/2016.

`` I, `=i?I,., :,"I. ;

'j-i:J <-.I|:>|

>~. 1-* _-

'--. i_ i., AND WHEREAS the High C€,}u`it:`'.upon perusing the petition and memorandum of grounds filed' herei'>ap.,:9`P:q,,I;,upon hearing the arguments of Sri .-I.il ..I KANADHI BHATLA SRINIVASA-:M+jF}tHY Advocate for the petitioner5l direct6d issue of notice to the Respond`ents herein to show cause as to why •i .`--~p +t'~'..`

this CIVIL REVISION PETITION shdL!i#`,ln'd{ be admitted.

You viz:

' ±3_I •:.._..;..i=.:...i*,.-?-.*:_.

'... a.``` .--.

1. The District Collector, CoIIectar?15?J.,`Suntur.

2. The Revenue DivisionaI Officer,.RDO, 'Office,14th crossroad, Guntur. `

3. The Tahsildar, Krosuru Manda!, K._ ./ +r'osuru, Sattenapalli.

4. Chadalavada Koti @ Chad9,laVa'da=.. Srinivasa rao @ srinivas, s/o.

....I.:\--

I/-

Radhaiah, 32 years, R/o. Vippar!€?I village Atchempeta MandaI, Guntur {. ,/ +

Djstrjct.

5. Chadalavada Radhaiah, *`®taiah, Aged about 82 years R/o.

Vipparla village, Atchempeta Mfo-;-, ndai:-,I Guntur District \.',`T_

f:+.' 1 . : i} . i:.--...I~ ,.'^.=.I are be and hereby directed to shove:-,;¥~SI`,quSe either appearing in person or through an advocate on or before ll,:CL?`.2025 to whI-Ch date the case stands posted for hearing as {o why in the cir?u.prstances set out in the petition and the memorandum of grounds filed'ther'ewith (copy enclosed) this CIVIL REVISION PETITION should not be adrf!.i#ed.

I+1 The Court made the following: ORDEE¥ `

\'+\. \.-. -_ . ' .`.:-. \

\' .'T.=.'~'_\ ` .`.+i ff Heard learned counsel for th9`, Petitioner.

Issue notice to the respondem.tisr'.-

Learned counsel for the p,egi.€,E©ner is permitted to take out personal notice to the respondents -amd file proof of service by the date of next adjournment.

-= I i:_ j!=.i-`.i--_\

sd/-K.J.RAJA BABU ASSISTgrGISTRA:

//TRUE. eOPY//

SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The District Collector, Collectarate, Guntur.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, RDO, Office,14th crossroad, Guntur.

3. The Tahsildar, Krosuru Manda!,.Krosuru, Sattenapalli.

4. Chadalavada @ Koti Chad.aiavada Srin'lvasa rao @ Srin®lvas, S/o.

Radhaiah, 32 years, R/o. Vipparia village Atchempeta MandaI, Guntur District.

5. Chadalavada Radhaiah, S/o| Kotaiah, Aged about 82 years R/o.:

. , .,-`\ `-`

vipparla v'lllage, Atchempeta Mandal, Guntur D-lstrict(1 to 5 by RPADT along with a copy of petition and memorandum of grounds)

6. One CC to SRl. KANADHI BHATLA SRINIVASA MURTHY Advocate L_-J[-'.I+

[OPUC]

7. One spare copy i ksr +