SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 10676

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
N. HARINATH, J
Meka Venkata Rami Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri Ramalakshmana Reddy SanePalli
For the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

1 `

J.``.`_i I._

•. " ` I, The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submI-tS that the betitioner is suffering due to the said crimes and contends that the `|tregI-StratiOn Of multiple offenceS {'dn the same cause of actI-On iS not bermjssible under law. -t vi \`

I -.,i, The learned Government PI6ad6r appearing for the state submits that first FIR was registered on o3.11|.2o24, vide Crime No.500 of 2024, on the file of Tadepalli Police Sti±+'i2dn, Guntur District for the alleged bffences under sections 153 (A), 5d5 lpc and 67 lTAL2000-2008.

The respondents are hereby,directed to I-nvestigate crime No.500

8f 2024, and there shall be stay of all further proceedings in the other §rjmes registered against the petiiidn6r. The complaints therein may be treated as statements under sectj6ri 162 of the Cr.P]C. There shall be a further direct:ion to the respondelltSl not tO register any addjtiona[ FIRS ;gainst the petitioner on the same I;ause of action| +I The learned Government Pri6`a`der for Home requests time to file con nter|affidavit.

+_ \-)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top