HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
N. HARINATH, J
Meka Venkata Rami Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
1 `
J.``.`_i I._
•. " ` I, The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submI-tS that the betitioner is suffering due to the said crimes and contends that the `|tregI-StratiOn Of multiple offenceS {'dn the same cause of actI-On iS not bermjssible under law. -t vi \`
I -.,i, The learned Government PI6ad6r appearing for the state submits that first FIR was registered on o3.11|.2o24, vide Crime No.500 of 2024, on the file of Tadepalli Police Sti±+'i2dn, Guntur District for the alleged bffences under sections 153 (A), 5d5 lpc and 67 lTAL2000-2008.
The respondents are hereby,directed to I-nvestigate crime No.500
8f 2024, and there shall be stay of all further proceedings in the other §rjmes registered against the petiiidn6r. The complaints therein may be treated as statements under sectj6ri 162 of the Cr.P]C. There shall be a further direct:ion to the respondelltSl not tO register any addjtiona[ FIRS ;gainst the petitioner on the same I;ause of action| +I The learned Government Pri6`a`der for Home requests time to file con nter|affidavit.
+_ \-)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.