Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
N. HARINATH, J
vankayalapati- Kiranmayee – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request to quash proceedings (Para 1) |
| 2. court's interim order extension and jurisdiction exercise (Para 2) |
lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVAT!`+
THURSDAY, THE NiNETEENTH DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE .-PRESENT.I THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH N CRIMINAL PETITION NO.-104 OF 2023 Between :
vankayalapatI- Kjranmayee, D/o Venkateswarlu, Aged about 54 Years, R/o Flat No.407, Este]la Apartment, whI-te Field Road, LakshmI- Cyber city, Kondapur, Hyderabad, Telangana;'-pI'n Code 500084.
...PetI'tiOner/Accused No.7 •. AND
1. The State of Andhra prac!esh, Rep. by the public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra pradesh at Amaravatj.
.,.Respondent
2. Goduguluri Naga Jyothi, W/o Srinivasa Rao, Aged about 41 Years, FIat No.501, Brundavan Apartment, opposite IDBA Bank, 7Th Line, Vl'kas Nagar, saibaba Road, Guntur, cell 9490820143 ...Respondent/Defacto -complainant petiti'on under section 482 of Cr.P.C is filed prayI-ng that in the circumstances stated in memorandum of grounds of criminal petjtjon, the High Court may be pleased to quash the entI're PrOCeedI'ngS jn C.C.Not736 of 2018 on the f[Ie of the Learned special Judicial I Class Magistrate fo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
