Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
N. HARINATH, J
M/s. Renen Vidhyut Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek to quash proceedings. (Para 1) |
| 2. conditions for initiating a complaint outlined. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. legal notice complies with required timeline. (Para 4) |
I CRL.P.No.2484 of 2025 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION No.2484 OF 2025 ORDER:
1. The petitioners are seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.
No.359 of 2017 on the file of the Court of the Additional Munsiff Magistrate, Kandukur, Prakasam District, for the alleged offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [for short, ‘N.l. Act’].
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the 2nd respondent had presented the cheque on 30.11.2015, 15.03.2016, 15.04.2016 and 15.05.2016. The learned counsel further submits that the cause of action would arise soon after the cheque was presented for clearance on the first occasion on 30.11.2015. It is submitted that the 2"'’ respondent has intimated the petitioners about the dishonour of cheque. However, presented the cheque on three other occasions and has taken the date 15.05.2016 as a cause of action and issued a legal notice on 19.05.2016. The learned counsel for the petitioners places reliance on the judgment
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
