Back
2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 11123
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J
Koppala Krishna – Appellant
Versus
State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others – Respondent
Writ Petition No: 38895/2018
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Srinivas Ambati
For the Respondents: M S R Chandra Murthy, K K Durga Prasad, GP for Panchayat Raj Rural Development (AP)
Writ petitions become infructuous when the relief sought is no longer applicable.
Headnote:Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to challenge the non-reinstatement of the petitioner. It was submitted that the relief sought had become infructuous, leading to the dismissal of the petition. The court concluded there would be no order as to costs.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition filed under article 226 seeking reinstatement. (Para 2) |
| 2. court concludes that the petition is dismissed due to infructuous nature. (Para 3) |
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer:
“…..to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Endorsement in Rc.No.15/2015/EGS/HR, dt.01.08.2018 passed by the 4th respondent thereby not reinstated the petitioner as Field Assistant working in Vijayarampuram Gram Panchayat of Sarubujjili Mandal in Srikakulam District without considering the proceedings in Rc.No.1362/G2/2015, dt. 17.06.2015 issued by Medical Superintendent, RIMS General Hospital, Srikakulam as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice, vioaltive of order dt. 12.04.2018 in W.P.No. 19573 of 2017 and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 4 and 5 to reinstate the petitioner into service for the said post by considering Medical Report dt.17.06.2015 issued by Medical Superintendent, RIMS General Hospital, Srikakulam and pass such other order or orders……”
2. Sri Srinivas Ambati, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the relief has become infructuous and petition may be disposed of.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents is in attendance.
