Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
N. HARINATH, J
M Brahmanada Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of A.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of fir and parties involved (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented by the parties (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's analysis on legal proceedings and limitations (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. principle of quashing based on legal findings (Para 15) |
| 5. final order issued by the court (Para 16) |
COMMON ORDER :
1. The criminal petitions are filed seeking quash of Crime No.7 of 2019 on the file of Kurnool CCS Police Station, Kurnool District.
Accused Nos.3 to 21 have filed CRLP.No.941 of 2020, Accused Nos.22 to 34 have filed CRLP.No.863 of 2020 and Accused Nos.35 to 39 have filed CRLP.No.1035 of 2020.
2. Sri.O.Manohar Reddy, learned senior counsel appears on behalf of petitioners. The learned senior counsel! submits that a complaint was filed before the Superintendent of Police, Kurnool on behalf of Ramapriya Nagar, Plot Owners Welfare Association alleging that Harijana Sanuvadi Venkataiah (late) and 38 others had fabricated the documents of Survey No.686/1 of Ramapriya Nagar, Kurnool Town and the President of the Association gave a complaint to the Superintendent of Police, Kurnool. On the strength of the Complaint the CCS Police have registered Crime No.7
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
