Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J
Mallavalli Dinesh @ Dhinesh – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners accused of online betting without initial fir mention. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by both sides on the bail application. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's observation on the nature and stage of investigation. (Para 5) |
The Criminal Petition has been filed under Sections 4 80 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for brevity [the BNSS '), seeking for grant of pre-arrest bail {o the petitioners/A.2 and A.8 in FIR No.77 of 2025 on the file of Cyber Crime Police Station, Visakhapatnam City, registered for the offences punishable under Section 111 (1),112(1), 318(4), 319(2) r/w 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity I the BNSJ), Section 66C and 66D of Information Act, 2000 (for short fthe lT Act') and Section 3 and 4 of AP Gaming AlcA.
J=l._ r -,.a e._-szsfi
2, The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners along with other accused have indulged I-n onlI-ne Cricket betting and alluring the valuable people to fall to their prey.
3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant public Prosecutor.
4. Srl-Y.V. Anl'l Kumar, learned counsel for the petI'tiOnerS, Submits that the petitI'O'nerS have not committed an
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
