HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Dr. Y. Lakshmana Rao, J
setty chennakesavulu – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
Respondent No.2 Respondent No.2 is impleaded aS Per the Court order dated 22.ll.2024 in I.A.No.1 of 2023 in Crl.R.C.No.877 of 2012.
Revision filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. aggrieved by the calendar and Judgment dated 14.06.2012 passed in C.A.No.109 of 2011 by the court of the sessions a.: prakasam Division :: Markapur, VI Addl. Dist. &
A-
Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), thereby confirming the calendar a-nd Judgment dated 12.07.2011 in S.C.No.357 of 2010 passed by the leamed Asst. Sessions Judge, Markapur, prakasam Dist.
IANO:1 OF 2023 Petition under section 482' of Cr.P.C is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to implead proposed respondent as party/respondent No. 2 to main Criminal RevI-SiOn Case in CrI.Rc. No. 877 of 2012, Pending disposal of CRLRC 877 of 2012, on the file of the High Court.
±A±!O: 1 OF 2012[CRLRC.M±±!Qi±£§gQL2Q±2±
Petition under sectI'On 397 (1) OF Crl.P.C. is fI-led praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petI|tiOn, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail by suspending the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.