HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J
D, Beerappa – Appellant
Versus
The Government of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
...Respond'ents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filedpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order direction more par{l-cularly o`ne in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rdrespondent wI-thOut taking action on enquiry notice 21.03.2017, even after lapse of 8 years pending issue though the petition submitted representation and 28.10.2024, 08.01.2025 having received representation from the petitioner and I-SSued enquiry notI'Ce 21.03.2017 therefore without conducted enquiry and without issuing notice fol.lowing procedure contemplated u/sec. 5 (3) ofAndhra Pradesh right in land and pattadar pass books Act 1971, High handedly amended the revenue records in the name of 6threspondent l'n sy.No.656/1/B an extent of o.o800 cents in Sy.No.657/5/B an extent of o.9700 cents in Sy.No.694/2/B an extent of Ac.1-4600 cents in the name of 5 respondent in sy.No.656/1 an extent of 0.900 cents in Sy. No.657/5A an extent of Ac. 0.9800 cents in Sy.No.694/1 an extent of Ac.1.4600 cents by issuing pattdar pass books and 1-B register is as illegal, improper and arbitrary
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.