HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
N. HARINATH, J
Parnapalli KI-Shore – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of parties and their claims. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. allegations of custodial torture. (Para 4) |
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusI'ng the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of sri v.R.Reddy Kowuri, Advocate for the PetI'{iOnerS and Of GP FOR HOME for Respondent Nos. 1 to 6, the C6utrflinade the following _O _RDER: ; ;,;:--;*,;.: , ff The present interlocutdry: `applI-CatiOn iS filed Seeking tO refer the Petitioners for fresh medical examinatI-On by an independent Government Doctor from a reputed Government Hospital outside ysR Kadapa Djstrj'ct.
The learned counsel for the petitI-OnerS SubmI-tS that the petitI-OnerS are arraI-gned as Accused Mos,7,ll,17,18,10 and 9 in Crime No.360 of
2025 on the file of pulivendu[a+(uG) Po[jce Station, Kadapa D[-strict for the alleged offence uncler sections 191(2),191(3), 324(4),109 read with ~' .i
109 ofBNS. t";`J The learned counsel for ;th~6 petitioners submI-tS that the petitioners were be`aten up and subjected to custodial torture by the respondent Mos.3 to 5 while they were arrested and in custody. The learned counsel for the petition6rs further submits that the p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.