SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 11984

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J
Sri Golagani Gopi – Appellant
Versus
Smt Golagani Meenakshi – Respondent
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 606 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri Kambhampati Ramesh Babu
For the Respondents: Public Prosecutor

The court emphasizes the need for timely resolution of family disputes while granting interim orders in criminal revisions.

Headnote:(A) Sections 438 and 442 of BNSS - Criminal Revision - Appeal against an order from the Additional Family Court requesting to set aside previous orders pertaining to a family court proceeding. The appellant seeks a stay of proceedings while the revision is pending. The court grants an interim extension of the stay order, highlighting the importance of judicial efficiency and justice in family matters. Parties involved: Appellant and Respondents including state representatives. (Paras 1 and 3)

(B) Judicial Procedure - Importance of timely hearings - The court recognizes constraints in scheduling but emphasizes the need for resolving family disputes effectively and efficiently. (Para 2)

Table of Content
1. arguments presented by the advocates. (Para 4)

Responclent Revision filed under Section 438 'and 442 of BNSS ., is filed prayI-ng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order anc! Decree dated 21.02.2025 passed in !oA.No. 202 of 2024 in F.C.O.P. No.1177 of 2018 on the file of Judge, AdditiQr!a! Family Court, Visakhapatnam anc! allow the I.A.No. 202 of 2024 in F.a.®.P. No.1177 of 2018 on the file of Judge, Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam in the interest of justice IANO:1 OF 2025 I-rji.-. [' I Petition under section-I 528 Qf. BNSS ., is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounqs_, filed in support of the CRIMINAL I lREVISION CASE, the High Court m,?,¥,Pe pleased to grant stay of all further . d / Proceedings in F.C.O.P. No.1177 p,I,`,?9.1.`8 on the file of the Judge, Additiona,I •\-'~

Family Court, Visakhapatnam pending_disposal of the above criminal revision case in the interest ofjustjce, ~ il;_.I.. ~

Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and' the earlier order of the High Court dt 22.05.2025 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of sri KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU Advocate for the petitioner and of PUBLIC .PROSECUTOR, for the Respondent 5N9.3 and the Court made the following;

i- '-r .ys_.

ORDER: 1l..-., i i... :.I--=l-i.'``.:_4...

f£Learned counsel for the p6tF`.-)`_t i.-o=,. ner js present.

_L.- 7,.I):

Due to paucity of time, this c®i2rt could not take up the matter for hearing.

List the matter after one (o1`.I week.

Interim Order granted earli'er ``.is extendecI till 1:he next .date of Sl`. ``"'

nearing."

i ` -. . -. I.\. . .-.-.`-,:- : _\`1._. `- B-.-i: f.:. i_- E.=\.I i = L-.=. E'.--`- ;. '\ . `-. `:i \ I-i.- .-: ., SD/- AB .V!-.J'

t .- -`

i` -I+ ASS !S+ARE a-I.§T R,`iP`

//TR-UE : copy//

SECT]ORE `:C}FFF!CER .-^± ` __. ``

To, i, 1. The Judge, AddI'tiOnaI Family Court, Visakhapatnam.

2. One CC to Sri. KAMBHAMPATFRAMESH BABU, Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of Andhra Pradesh;

Amaravati. [ouT] 'j::`'+

4. One spare copy i-.:.-?_

KSR -. :f=.I. '^r.

t|

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top