Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA, J
Smt. Raayi Simhachalam – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. validity of claim over ancestral land pending further decision. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. procedural fairness required in land dispossession cases. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. government role in mediating disputes over land possession. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court orders must be obeyed regarding possession. (Para 7) |
Smt. Raayi Simhachalam, W/o R.Ramulu, aged about 75 years, R/o D.No.6-
542, Pedagadili Village, Visakhapatnam urban, visakhapatnam Dist u/
..IPetitioneF L, AND
1. State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by l'ts principal Secretary, Reveifu6 Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
2. The District Collector, Visakhapatnam District, at Visakhapatnam. tr-
3. The Revenue Divisional offI-Cer, Visakhapatnam, vI-SakhaPatnam \__. -
DI'StriCt.
/, 4. The TahsI'Idar, Anandapuram ``M+andal, Visakhapatnam, vI-SakhaPatnam District.
...Respondent§'
Petition under ArtI'Cle 226 of the Constitution of India praying that I-n the`
circumstances stated I-n the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be'`
•¢z£`` :rif\
pleased to issue an approprl-ate writ, order or dl-rection more particularly one in the nature of wrI-I Of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents, more particula
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
