Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAP, J
Ithadi Ajay Kumar, Ithadi Venkatammma, Gaddam Navamma, Gaddam Venkataiah, Gudimi Babji, Sattenapalli Sriramulu – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed to quash proceedings under pocso. (Para 2) |
| 2. court assesses arguments for presence requirement. (Para 3) |
| 3. court grants relief from mandatory appearance. (Para 4) |
| 4. final direction for matter listing after four weeks. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
i IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI ’U}'/
MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST, is ■ri .•^1 TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE srr> /iml \
iPRESENT:
> i’.'
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7657 OF 2025 Between:
1. Ithadi Ajay Kumar, (A1), S/o. Srinivasulu, Aged 23 years, Occ. Coolie, Resident of Venkata Rao Palli Village, Udayagiri Mandal, Nellore District, Andhra Pradesh.
2. Ithadi Venkatammma, (A2), W/o. Srinivasulu, Aged 45 years, Occ. Agriculture Coolies, Resident of Venkata Rao Palli Village, Udayagiri Mandal, Nellore District, Andhra Pradesh.
3. Gaddam Navamma (A3), W/p. Venkateswarlu, Aged 40 Years, Occ.
Agriculture Coolie, Resident of Venkata Rao Palli Village, Udayagiri Mandal, Nellore District, Andhra Pradesh
4. Gaddam Venkataiah (A5), S/o. Late Ramaiah, Aged 75 years. Resident of Venkata Rao Palli Village, Udayagiri Mandal, Nellore District, Andhra Pradesh
5. Gudimi Ba
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
