Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Dr. Y. Lakshmana Rao, J
Sangati Chandrasekhar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. fraudulent claims regarding property ownership. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding pre-arrest bail and implications. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. granting bail and its relation to ongoing investigation. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. conditional grant of bail for one accused. (Para 11) |
ORDER:
Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNS S ’) by the Petitioners/Accused Nos.10 and 11 for granting pre-arrest bail in connection with Crime No.251 of 2025 of Badvel (Urban) Police Station, Badvel, Kadapa District, registered for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 318 (4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 342(1) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNS ’).
2. The case of the prosecution is that the de-facto complainant, K. Tribhuvan, Tahsildar of Gopavaram Mandal, on 19.07.2025, while present in his office, received a representation from Thodeti Ramanamma, wife of Thodeti Narasimhulu, resident of Shivanagar, Badvel Town, Badvel Municipality, Kadapa District. She stated that she had purchased a property admeasuring Ac.0.03 cents in Sy.No.1012/1 situated at Madakalavaripalle village fields, within the limits of G
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
