Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J
Muggu Venkatesulu – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the court's directive for recruitment based on merit and caste certificate validity. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. request for interim consideration based on prior case laws. (Para 3) |
| 3. the court's emphasis on parity in judicial decisions for recruitment. (Para 4 , 5) |
ORDER: + a ~' `
f[Heard. r~
Learned Counsel for the-i' petitioner submitted that, in'J a similai case, this court has passed' ari`'i'nterim order in w.p|No.22173/2025 on 22.08.2625 and prayed to consi-der this case also in the similar lines om the ground of parityr#
Learned counsel for the 'fespondents submitted that similar orders \-J./
may be passed.
Taking the submissions irito consideration, this Court is inclineci to pass the interim order of int6r'§r{1 Order Passed in W.P.No.22173/2025 on the grounds of parity. \ar Accordingly, the respondents are directed to consider the case of petitioner unless and until his caste certificate is cancelled im accordance with lawI"1#r`
...
SD/-M.PRABHAKARA RAo ASSISTANT RE lm`uE COPYll SECTION I,.:.=l`!l`.q.I To]
``\. .
1. The Principal Secretary,` `State of Andhra Pradesh, Social Warfare (cv-I) Dep¥rtment, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur, Guntur District.
\ho¢.of`F*
2. The P
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
