Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO, J
SMT. C. SHARADA, SMT. C. SHARADA, W/O. LATE. C. YELLAPA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks action on unaddressed mutation applications. (Para 1 , 1) |
| 2. importance of timely responses in the judicial process. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. directive for thorough examination and timely decision. (Para 5) |
| 4. writ petition disposed with no costs. (Para 6) |
1. GP FOR REVENUE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.21758 of 2025 ORDER:-
Pithily this writ petition is filed on the ground that applications bearing Nos.MUT240316001077 and MUT240316001230 dated 16.03.2024 was made to the authorities, but it was not addressed. Therefore, it is urged that the respondents be directed to address the applications, as such direction would suffice in the circumstances of the case.
2. The Hon’ble Apex Court in The Government of India vs P.
Venkatesh held as follows:
“…Dispose of the representation mantra is increasingly permeating the judicial process in the High Courts and the Tribunals. Such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not service to the cause of justice. The litigant is back again before the Court, as this case shows, having incurred attendant costs and suffered delays
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
