Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
SUMATHI JAGADAM, J
Delhi Public School, Bhimavaram, Rep. by its Franchisee, Vatsavai Subbaraju Kamala Education Society – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition concerns franchise rights. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by counsel. (Para 3) |
| 3. court stresses adherence to due process. (Para 4) |
| 4. interim protective order issued. (Para 5) |
' :v IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDMRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) !■ r/ *
TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST 'f TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
3 : PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 17893 OF 2025 Between:
Delhi Public School, Bhimavaram, Rep. by its Franchisee, Vatsavai Subbaraju Kamala Education Society, Rep. by its Chairman, Vatsavai Srinivas Raju, S/o Subba Raju, Age 55 yrs, R/o D.No.27-3-85, Sriramapuram, Bhimavaram, West Godavari District.
Petitioner AiND
1. The Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary Ministry of Education, H.R.
Department, New Delhi.
2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.
3. The Central Board of Secondary^ Education, Rep. by its Secretary, Preet Vihar, New Delhi.
4. The Delhi Public School, Society, Rep. by its chairman, F Block, East of Kailash, New Delhi.
Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
