SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 13860

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J
G RAJESH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7951/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: RAJA REDDY KONETI
For the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The gravity of criminal charges outweighs personal circumstances in pre-arrest bail considerations.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Sections 115(2), 118(1), 324(4), 351(3) - Pre-arrest bail application - Petitioner accused of serious offences including assault and criminal intimidation - Court emphasizes the gravity of charges, specifically mentioning legal precedents on bail granting powers. (Paras 1, 11)

(B) Pre-arrest bail - Conditions for granting - Seriousness of accusations necessitates immediate investigation, supported by explicit acts of the accused; academic background deemed insufficient to grant bail against serious allegations. (Paragraph 11)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner is accused, along with others, of physically assaulting the complainant and attempting murder. The incident arose from prior enmity, and specific incidents of violence and intimidation are detailed in the prosecution's account. The complainant alleges that he was assaulted and that his uncle was stabbed during a premeditated attack.

Findings of Court:
The court finds the accusations well-founded and serious, establishing that the petitioner’s reasons for seeking bail do not outweigh the severity of the charges, leading to the dismissal of the bail application.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the evidence supported granting pre-arrest bail to the petitioner amidst serious criminal allegations.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the judicial precedents emphasize the gravity of charges in determining bail eligibility, affirming that the mere potential threat to the accused's future is inadequate in light of serious accusations against them.

Result: Criminal Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. assault and intimidation incidents detailed. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. petitioner's legal arguments against the charges. (Para 5 , 6)
3. prosecution emphasizes severity and need for investigation. (Para 8 , 9)
4. court's findings on bail and nature of allegations. (Para 10 , 11)
5. final decision on the bail application. (Para 12)

ORDER

The Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS ’) by the petitioner/Accused No.4 for granting of pre-arrest bail in connection with Crime No.24 of 2025 of Thamballapalli Police Station, Chittoor District, registered for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 115 (2), 324(4), 118(1), 351(3)

read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNS’).

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 10.05.2025 at 07:30 p.m., the complainant, Yeddula Niranjan had gone to flour mill to grind rice. After handing over the rice to Narasimha, the operator of the mill, the complainant sat on a bench opposite the premises. At that time, five individuals namely Botikinda Teja Murthy (A-1), Yeddula Naresh (A-2), Thurugonda Madhusudan (A-3), Madanapalli Rajesh (A-4), and Bangalore Yashwanth (A-5) arrived from a nearby wedding venue and began to verbally abuse the complainant without any provocation. When the complainant questioned the reason for such insults, Teja Murthy (A-1) allegedly assaulted him by punching his back. Rajesh (A-4) then held the complainant by the throat and continued to abuse him, while Naresh (A-2) and Madhusudan (A-3) kicked him with their legs. Upon hearing the complainant’s cries, his relative Madhukar arrived at the scene, intervened, and managed to pacify the situation, causing the accused to disperse.

3. Following the incident, the complainant returned to his residence in Burujupalli Village, Zunzurupenta Panchayathi, Thamballapalli Mandal, Annamayya District, had dinner, and went to bed along with his maternal uncle, Prasad. However, in the early hours of 11.05.2025, at around 01:00 AM, the accused persons (A-2 to A-5) allegedly arrived at the complainant’s residence in a Tata Intra transport vehicle bearing registration number KA50 B 2431, with the intent to further assault him. They began pelting stones at the complainant’s house, prompting the complainant and his uncle Prasad to come outside. At that moment, Rajesh (A-4) allegedly attempted to attack the complainant with a knife, with the intention to cause grievous harm or death. When Prasad intervened to protect his nephew, Rajesh (A-4) stabbed him on the left cheek. Naresh (A-2) also attempted to assault the complainant with a knife. Upon hearing the commotion, the complainant’s father, Veeranjaneyulu, came out of the house and raised an alarm, causing the accused persons (A-2 to A-5) to flee from the scene. Thereafter, the complainant, along with his father and friend Narendra, transported the injured Prasad to the Government Hospital at Thamballapalli for medical attention.

4. The attending medical officer referred the injured to the Government Hospital at Madanapalle for further treatment. Upon evaluation, the doctors at Madanapalle referred the injured to Nemali Facial Surgical and Multi-Specialty Dental Center, Madanapalle, where he was admitted for specialized care. On 12.05.2025 at about 06:00 p.m., the complainant approached the Police Station and lodged the present complaint. The motive behind the alleged offences is stated to be prior enmity between the complainant and accused persons (A-1 andA-2).

5. Sri Raja Reddy Koneti, learned counsel for the Petitioner contends that the alleged offences pertain to Sections 115 (2), 118(1), 324(4), and 351(3) of ‘the BNS’. Section 115 (2) corresponds to voluntarily causing hurt, punishable with imprisonment up to one year or with fine. Section 118 (1) relates to causing injury by means of weapons or dangerous instruments. Section 324 (4) of ‘the BNS’ pertains to mischief result

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top