SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 13894

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
BATTU DEVANAND, J
Mutyala Param Jyothi – Appellant
Versus
Mutyala Vijika – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri Sai Saran Chodisetty
For the Respondents:

Table of Content
1. stay of proceedings under section 151 cpc. (Para 1)
2. interim stay granted for three weeks. (Para 3)

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND -

.>5-

lA N0.1 OF 2025 IN CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2009 OF 2025 Between:

Mutyala Param Jyothi, S/o. Korneli, aged about 46 years, R/o. 7-2-143, I.P.C. Church, Kakumanuvari Thota, Donka Road, Guntur Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh-522002 \

> ... Petitioner/Petitioner AND Mutyala Vijika, W/o Mutyala Param Jyothi, aged about 41 years D/o. Mogili Ramana, R/o. D.No. 8-5-19, Balaji Raopet, Tenali, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh-522202 .... Respondent/Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SAI SARAN CHODISETTY Counsel for the Respondent:

Petition under Section 151 CPC is filedpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all the further proceedings in F.C.O.P No. 419 of 2018 on the file of the Family Judge Court cum XII Addl. District Judge Court, Guntur; Pending disposal of CRP No. 2009 of 2025, on the file of the High Court.

The court while directing issue of notice to the Respondents herein to show cause as to why this application should not

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top