Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
N. HARINATH, J
Mohammad Irfan – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. legal challenge regarding unauthorized demolition. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. necessity of lawful process in administrative actions. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. constitutional protection of community rights. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. interim relief extended pending further proceedings. (Para 7) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AW^
(SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) ip WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUG^
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE iPRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 3434 OF 2025 AND 4948 OF 2023 WRIT PETITION NO: 3434 OF 2025:
Between:
Mohammad Irfan, S/o. Late Mohammad Jalal, Aged about 35 years. Hereditary Muthawalli, Masjid-E-AyishaSunna (Able Hadees Mosque), Plot No.26, RTD Layout, Musalayyapalem, Sagar Nagar, Visakhapatnam, R/o. H.No.24-49-39A, Ambusarang Street, Old Post Office, I Town, Visakhapatnam - 530001.
...Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, A.P. Secretariat at Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
2. The Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation (GVMC), Rep. by its Commissioner, Visakhapatnam.
3. The District Collector, Visakhapatnam District, Visakhapat
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
