SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 14179

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Dr. Y. Lakshmana Rao, J
Ganagalla Prasad – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: V. Vijaya Vardhan
For the Respondents: Public Prosecutor

ORDER:

The Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS ’), seeking to enlarge the petitioner/Accused on bail in Cr.No.15 of 2024 of Bhimavaram Police Station, West Godavari District, registered against the Petitioner/Accused herein for the offences punishable under Section

306 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for brevity ‘the I.P.C.’).

2. An application was filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity ‘the Cr.PC.,) seeking for grant of prearrest bail in Crl.M.P.No.15/2024, but it was dismissed. Again, the Petitioner filed a second application, it was allowed, but not an order as contemplated under Section 438 of ‘the Cr.PC.,’ that in the event of his arrest he shall be enlarged on bail.

The learned Trial Court granted pre-arrest bail, but a direction was issued that he should execute self-bond of Rs.25,000/- before the learned II Additional Judicial Magistrate. This order., is against the spirit of Section 438 of ‘the Cr.PC. Normally, pre-arrest bail is granted, and a direction would be given to the Police Officer that in the event of arrest of the Petitio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top