Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Battu Devanand, J
Karasalan Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Mogili Srinivasa Rao – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts establishing the basis for the appeal. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's observation on necessity of interim orders. (Para 4) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY'OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND IANo.1 OF2025 IN CRP NO: 1294 OF 2025 Betwee n :
Karasalan Kumari, W/o. Late Abrahamlinkan, Aged about 50 years, Junior Assistant, Mandal Development Officer, Yadlapadu Village and MandaI, Guntur District. R R/o.H.No.10-7-275, Flat No.302, Sri Sai Avisha Nilayam, 2nd Lane, Stambalagaruvu, Guntur;; Guntur District.
...Petitl-oner/Judgment Debtor/Defendant AND
1. Mogili Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Late Basavapunnaiah, Aged about 55 years, R/o.H.No.22-16-3, Kothapet, Tenali, Guntur, Guntur District.
. . .Respondent/Decree Holder/Plaintiff
2. The Mandal Parishat Development Officer, Mandala PraJ-a Parishat Office, Peddanandipadu, Guntur District.
...Respondent/Garnishee Petition under section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated I-n the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in Pursuance Of Order dated
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
