HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J
M/s. Muthoot Fincrop Limited – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. main grievance regarding police procedure in handling seized gold. (Para 3) |
| 2. court emphasizes due process and legal protocol in enforcement actions. (Para 4) |
| 3. direction for police to follow legal procedures for gold handover. (Para 6) |
...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order, or direction, particularly in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, by declaring the notice issued under Section 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 , dated 20-06-2025, in connection with FIR. No. 23M2024 on the file of Samalkot Police Station against the branch of Petitioner Company (Impugned Notice) and consequently extending threats to the employees of the Petitioner Company to hand over the gold and interfering with the day to day business activities of the Petitioner Company without following due process of law as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the law and consequently set aside the impugned notice dt. 20.06.2025 and further direct the Respondent No.2 not to interfere with the business activities of the Petit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.