Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
B.V.L.N. Chakravarthi, J
Gude Srinivasa Rao – Appellant
Versus
Sallury Mary – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges the validity of notice due to address issues. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. notice sent was invalid as the petitioner did not reside at the listed address. (Para 4) |
| 3. the question of fact regarding residence must be decided at trial. (Para 5 , 6) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 13 OF 2023 Between:
Gude Srinivasa Rao, S/o Rathaiah, Hindu, aged about
35 years.
residing in the house in Door No.6-8-17/a, 8/1 Arundelpet, Guntur-522
002, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner/Accused AND
1. Sallury Mary, W/o Late Raja Rao, Hindu, Aged 53 years, resident of Arundelpet, 10/4, Pithukalagunta, Rajiv Gandhi, Rrajakula Colony, Guntur.
...Respondent/Complainant
2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. at Amaravathi.
...Respondent Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.1819 of
2020 on the file the Honourable Special Mobile Magi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
