Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
V. SUJATHA, J
MADIIREDDY RAMI REDDY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges suspension without due process. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. court examines legal standards of notice and opportunity. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. affirmation of rights to a fair hearing. (Para 6) |
| 4. overall ruling in favor of the petitioner. (Para 7 , 8) |
ORDER
The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-
“…. to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction declaring the action of the 2ndrespondent in suspending the authorization of the petitioner vide proceedings in Rc.No.F/494/2025 dated 01.08.2025 without giving any fair opportunity to the petitioner to submit his explanation is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of constitution of India consequently set asideand to pass such other order or orders ….”
2. Petitioner is appointed as fair price shop dealer on temporary basis, as per the orders of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Penukonda on 06.08.2008. Since the date of his appointment, the petitioner has been running the said fair price shop without any complaints either from the card holders or from the concerned authorities.
3. While the matter being so, petiti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
