2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 5402
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRSENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 6815 OF 2023 Between:
1. M/S. NAGABHUSHANAM AND CO., 905, Street No. 8, F-24, Sainath Apartments, Venkataramana Colony, Khairatabad Hyderabad- 500 004 represented by its Managing Partner ...PETITIONER(S)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Represented by its Secretary, Roads and Buildings Department 5th Block, 1st Floor, Room No.213, A.P. Secretariat Office, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh
2. Engineer-in-Chief, RandB, MDR, R and B Complex, 4th Floor, RTA office Rd., Punamrnathota, Labbipet, Vijayawada, Krishna District Andhra Pradesh - 520010
3. Superintending Engineer, RandB Circle, Collectorate Compound, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh 522004
4. Executive Engineer, RandB Division, Narasaraopet, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh 522601 ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner(s): RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE V. SUJATHA Writ Petition No.6815 of 2023
ORDER:
The present writ petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
“....to issue a writ, order or direction particularly in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or orders or direction declaring the inaction of the Respondents in obtaining the administrative sanction and finalising the final bill and releasing payments in terms of L.S.Agreement C.R.No.83/2012-13 dated 24.01.2013 including the supplementary agreeement C.R.No.79/2013-14 dated 13.10.2013 based on the final bill certificate issued by 4th Respondent on 20.06.2014 and in terms of the petitioners letters dated 07.02.2020 and 30.11.2020 as illegal, arbitrary, amounts to non-discharge of a legal obligation conferred on them and is in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith finalise the final bill and make payment in terms of L.S. Supplemental Agreement C.R.No.79/2013-14 dated 13.11.2013 final bill certificate issued by 4th Respondent on 20.06.2014 and in terms of the letter of the Petitioner dated 30.11.2020 and pass.....”
2. The petitioner is a registered ‘Special Class Contractor’ with the Government of Andhra Pradesh and a Partnership Firm registered with the Registrar of Firms, Hyderabad bearing No.952 of 2001 and is engaged in the construction of bridges, roads, aqueducts and irrigation projects besides other infrastructure activities for more than four decades and the work relating to the “Strengthening of Dachepalli – Tangeda Road from KM 0.000 to 13.000 in Guntur District” was awarded to the petitioner through Cr.Agt.No.83/2012-13, dated 24.01.2013 for an amount of Rs.3,30,97,942/- by the 3rd respondent with a period of completion of one year.
3. The petitioner further submitted that the respondents felt certain deviations necessary to suit the site conditions prior to the commencement of both the B.T. and C.C. road and such the 2nd respondent accorded permission for deviation and the original estimate for the work was revised from Rs.3,50,00,000/- to Rs.3,85,00,000/- vide memo No.Plan work/NRT/D-T Road/DEE 1/AEE 1/2012 dated 24.05.2013 and a supplemental agreement through L.S.Supplemental Cr.Agt.No.79/2013-14 dated 13.11.2013 was concluded between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent. The extension of the time period without liquidated damages was accorded up to 31.03.2014.
4. The petitioner had completed the work in all respects by March 2014 and requested the respondents to pay the final bill. But the respondents failed to pay the final bill even after a lapse of more than three and a half years. Hence, the petitioner, on
12.12.2017, addressed a letter to the 4th respondent.
5. The 4th respondent prepared a working estimate of Rs.3,59,99,000/- and forwarded the same to the 3rd respondent and it was approved on 13.05.2019. Despite agreeing to receive the final bill in accordance with the original agreement, no payment was made to the petitioner till then and hence, they made several representations on 07.02.2020 and 30.11.2020 but there is no reply from the respondents. Hence, this writ petition.
6. Learned Government Pleader has furnished a copy of the instructions of the 4th respondent vide Lr.No.Instruction notes/EC1/2022-2023 dated 18.03.2023 wherein it is stated that the petitioner/contractor has executed all the works and they have admitted that this office has submitted VIII & final bill to a tune of Rs.37,64,000/- to the Pay & Accounts Officer, Lingamguntla vide token No.2180 dated 24.06.2014 for arranging payment.
7. The Pay & Accounts Officer, Lingamguntla has rejected the bill duly raising an objection that the value of work done is greater than the Administrative Sanction and requested this office to obtain revised administrative sanction vide Lr.No.APAO/W&P/NRT/Sn.III/R&B/14-15/44, dated 21.07.2014. The Engineer-in-Chief (R&B) Roads has issued permission to approve working estimate at circle leve